Europe and North America are being painted a fresh new colour - green. Recently, two of the biggest political names in Britain, Gordon Brown and David Cameron openly engaged in a battle with each other over green issues, each trying to promote himself as the more environmentally conscious. While the Conservatives announced major pan-UK projects to reduce carbon emissions, the Labour Party made a pledge to ban energy-guzzling conventional light-bulbs by 2011. Meanwhile, a Lindbergh flight away, in North America, Dubya and Co are seriously contemplating cutting the American consumption of gasoline by atleast 20% in the next 10 years by switching to alternative fuels like ethanol. Neighbour Canada had already made a commitment last december to increase biofuel consumption to atleast 5% of total fuel consumption in the country by 2010. Iceland had long before adopted a resolution to ban fossil fuels altogether within 30 years.
Of course, one can't really believe that most politicians (no matter where they're from) actually are concerned - it's quite obvious that they (with a few exceptions like Al Gore) are playing for the green votebank. Global Warming, which politicians and public had earlier dismissed as just another theory, is now literally making them feel hot under the collar. Increasing industrialisation, urbanisation and major wars like the Iraq conflict have only made it more difficult for everyone. Scientists had predicted as long back as 1992 that Global Warming is a real phenomenon and will soon come into effect. And as usual, people have woken up a trifle later. Still, it's good to see that some efforts are being made.
But strangely enough, these critical issues aren't being discussed where they matter the most - the third world. It is in the developing countries that the fate of the fight against Global Warming is going to be decided. The BRIC nations and other such countries are going to be the actual battlefields. Why? It is because that in the next half-century, countries like China, India and Russia are going to be the fastest growing economies in the world. And economies can't grow quickly if industries don't grow quickly and rapidly growing industries imply rapidly increasing pollution.
The negative impact of such rapid growth is already being seen. In China, there have been riots in the smaller towns due to increasing pollution from nearby industries. According to the WHO, seven of the ten most polluted cities in the world are located in China. It is the second largest contributor to world carbon emissions after the United States but at the current rate of industrialisation, it can soon become number one. Industrial effluents released by Chinese factories near the Russian border have resulted in the contamination of many Russian rivers and the loss of jobs for hundreds of Siberian fishermen.*
The situation in India, though slightly better, is nothing much to talk about either. India accepted the Kyoto Protocol in 2002 but is exempt from the main framework of the treaty. This means that it has permission to pollute the environment to a greater extent than developed nations in order to pursue its economic objectives. Fair enough, but that doesn't change the fact that India better start worrying about Global Warming. Being an equatorial country with a large coastline, it is one of the biggest potential victims of this event and if measures aren't taken quickly, there'll be worse things to worry about than a bearish Sensex.
Pollution in India is rampant. This country has the highest percentage of premature deaths due to pollution in the world. India's energy consumption is increasing rapidly. Urbanisation and industrialisation resulted in a 208% increase in energy consumption from 1980 to 2000. Such figures have resulted in India's energy usage increasing at a faster rate even than that of China, which experienced a 130% increase in energy consumption in the same time frame. And worryingly, the major source of India's energy is the cheap, easy-to-build thermal power plant whose coal burning only makes the situation worse.
What's being done to address this issue? Practically nothing. The Environmental Protection Act was introduced more than 20 years ago but as usual, red tape in the bureaucracy has resulted in its unofficial death. India's forest cover is barely 25% of available land (the ideal figure is 33%) and is quickly diminishing. Far worse, projects by Indian companies, both public and private, can potentially contribute a lot to pollution. For example, there is the low-cost four-wheeler project by Tata Motors which will result in thousands of more cars on the road leading to more air pollution. And then there was the plan to legalize illegal encroachments in Bangalore's green belt that helped cut down a few more trees. Last year, I read an article in The Economist (i don't remember which issue) about how, at an environmental summit in Kenya(?), India's official delegate refused to introduce any legislations that would reduce emissions citing India's need to progress economically as an excuse. I wonder if he knew that economists have predicted that environmental pollution actually cuts out 8-9% of China's GDP every year. And what can happen to China can happen to us if we aren't careful.
Meanwhile, the environment continues to deteriorate. Forests are shrinking quickly and the climate's changing pretty fast but lots of people still haven't learnt. Recently, one of the last seven Amur leopards in the wild was killed by poachers which means that this beautiful animal's extinction is almost confirmed. And if a certain discovery channel programme is right, humanity will go the same way by 2100 if nothing is done within the next ten years.
*Source: The Internet: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/chinaenv.html
Of course, one can't really believe that most politicians (no matter where they're from) actually are concerned - it's quite obvious that they (with a few exceptions like Al Gore) are playing for the green votebank. Global Warming, which politicians and public had earlier dismissed as just another theory, is now literally making them feel hot under the collar. Increasing industrialisation, urbanisation and major wars like the Iraq conflict have only made it more difficult for everyone. Scientists had predicted as long back as 1992 that Global Warming is a real phenomenon and will soon come into effect. And as usual, people have woken up a trifle later. Still, it's good to see that some efforts are being made.
But strangely enough, these critical issues aren't being discussed where they matter the most - the third world. It is in the developing countries that the fate of the fight against Global Warming is going to be decided. The BRIC nations and other such countries are going to be the actual battlefields. Why? It is because that in the next half-century, countries like China, India and Russia are going to be the fastest growing economies in the world. And economies can't grow quickly if industries don't grow quickly and rapidly growing industries imply rapidly increasing pollution.
The negative impact of such rapid growth is already being seen. In China, there have been riots in the smaller towns due to increasing pollution from nearby industries. According to the WHO, seven of the ten most polluted cities in the world are located in China. It is the second largest contributor to world carbon emissions after the United States but at the current rate of industrialisation, it can soon become number one. Industrial effluents released by Chinese factories near the Russian border have resulted in the contamination of many Russian rivers and the loss of jobs for hundreds of Siberian fishermen.*
The situation in India, though slightly better, is nothing much to talk about either. India accepted the Kyoto Protocol in 2002 but is exempt from the main framework of the treaty. This means that it has permission to pollute the environment to a greater extent than developed nations in order to pursue its economic objectives. Fair enough, but that doesn't change the fact that India better start worrying about Global Warming. Being an equatorial country with a large coastline, it is one of the biggest potential victims of this event and if measures aren't taken quickly, there'll be worse things to worry about than a bearish Sensex.
Pollution in India is rampant. This country has the highest percentage of premature deaths due to pollution in the world. India's energy consumption is increasing rapidly. Urbanisation and industrialisation resulted in a 208% increase in energy consumption from 1980 to 2000. Such figures have resulted in India's energy usage increasing at a faster rate even than that of China, which experienced a 130% increase in energy consumption in the same time frame. And worryingly, the major source of India's energy is the cheap, easy-to-build thermal power plant whose coal burning only makes the situation worse.
What's being done to address this issue? Practically nothing. The Environmental Protection Act was introduced more than 20 years ago but as usual, red tape in the bureaucracy has resulted in its unofficial death. India's forest cover is barely 25% of available land (the ideal figure is 33%) and is quickly diminishing. Far worse, projects by Indian companies, both public and private, can potentially contribute a lot to pollution. For example, there is the low-cost four-wheeler project by Tata Motors which will result in thousands of more cars on the road leading to more air pollution. And then there was the plan to legalize illegal encroachments in Bangalore's green belt that helped cut down a few more trees. Last year, I read an article in The Economist (i don't remember which issue) about how, at an environmental summit in Kenya(?), India's official delegate refused to introduce any legislations that would reduce emissions citing India's need to progress economically as an excuse. I wonder if he knew that economists have predicted that environmental pollution actually cuts out 8-9% of China's GDP every year. And what can happen to China can happen to us if we aren't careful.
Meanwhile, the environment continues to deteriorate. Forests are shrinking quickly and the climate's changing pretty fast but lots of people still haven't learnt. Recently, one of the last seven Amur leopards in the wild was killed by poachers which means that this beautiful animal's extinction is almost confirmed. And if a certain discovery channel programme is right, humanity will go the same way by 2100 if nothing is done within the next ten years.
*Source: The Internet: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/chinaenv.html